A listed manufacturing company may have 12 plants, 4 warehouses, 900 permanent employees, 2,500 contract workers, 300 suppliers, 8 product categories and 5 different environmental permissions. At the time of annual report preparation, the finance team may close revenue numbers on time, but the ESG team may still be waiting for electricity bills, water withdrawal data, waste manifests, EPR certificates, accident records, training data, complaints data and supplier declarations.
This is where BRSR Reporting in India becomes a serious compliance task. It is not only a sustainability write-up. It is a structured ESG disclosure under SEBI, supported by numerical data and verifiable records.
For manufacturers, importers, brand owners, recyclers, listed companies and large supply chain businesses, BRSR has become a board-level reporting requirement. A single wrong number in waste generation, Scope 1 emissions, Scope 2 emissions, employee count, EPR applicability or environmental compliance can create exchange queries, investor concerns, assurance delays and internal governance issues.
The practical challenge is simple. BRSR asks for data, but the evidence sits across multiple departments. Finance has turnover and energy invoices. HR has employee data. Plant teams have water, fuel and waste data. Compliance teams have CTE, CTO, hazardous waste authorization, EPR registration, CPCB portal filings and SPCB communications. Procurement teams have supplier details. Unless this data is collected in a structured way, the annual BRSR filing becomes a last-minute risk.
For a company covered under BRSR Core, the risk is higher because the data may be assessed or assured. That means the company should maintain calculation sheets, source documents, plant-wise records, approval trails and sign-off records before the annual report is finalized.
BRSR means Business Responsibility and Sustainability Report. It is India’s ESG disclosure framework for listed entities. It replaced the earlier Business Responsibility Report and gives investors, regulators and stakeholders a more detailed view of how a company manages environmental, social and governance issues.
The BRSR format is divided into 3 main sections. Section A covers general disclosures, Section B covers management and process disclosures, and Section C covers principle-wise performance disclosures. SEBI’s BRSR format begins with Section A on general disclosures, including listed entity details such as CIN, name, year of incorporation, registered office, corporate address, email, telephone, website, financial year and stock exchanges.
Section B checks whether the company has policies, procedures, board approval, value chain coverage, ESG targets, governance oversight and review mechanisms across the 9 principles of the National Guidelines on Responsible Business Conduct.
Section C is the most data-heavy section. It requires companies to disclose essential indicators and optional leadership indicators for each principle. SEBI’s format states that essential indicators are expected to be disclosed by every mandated entity, while leadership indicators may be disclosed voluntarily by entities aiming for higher maturity.
In simple terms, BRSR converts ESG into numbers. A company must disclose how much energy it used, how much water it withdrew, how much waste it generated, how many employees were trained, how many complaints were received, how many were pending, whether environmental laws were complied with and whether ESG policies are reviewed by senior management.
A good BRSR report answers 5 practical questions:
BRSR is mandatory for the top 1000 listed companies based on market capitalization. NSE’s BRSR filing guidance states that top one thousand listed companies based on market capitalization must submit BRSR in the format specified by SEBI’s circular dated 10 May 2021.
BRSR became voluntary for FY 2021-22 and mandatory for the top 1000 listed entities from FY 2022-23. In 2026, companies within this market capitalization threshold must treat BRSR as part of their annual report compliance, not as a separate branding document.
BRSR Core adds another layer. BRSR Core is a subset of BRSR made up of Key Performance Indicators under 9 ESG attributes. SEBI’s 12 July 2023 circular introduced a phased glide path for BRSR Core assurance, starting with the top 150 listed entities in FY 2023-24, top 250 in FY 2024-25, top 500 in FY 2025-26 and top 1000 in FY 2026-27.
This timeline is important for compliance planning. A company entering the top 500 in FY 2025-26 or the top 1000 in FY 2026-27 cannot build assurance-ready ESG data in the final month. It needs at least 4 quarters of evidence, internal controls, plant-level tracking and management review.
| Category | Applicability | Timeline | Main Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top 1000 listed entities | Full BRSR filing | Annual report cycle | Exchange observation and investor concern |
| Top 150 listed entities | BRSR Core assurance | FY 2023-24 | Assurance qualification |
| Top 250 listed entities | BRSR Core assurance | FY 2024-25 | Incomplete KPI evidence |
| Top 500 listed entities | BRSR Core assurance | FY 2025-26 | Late data system readiness |
| Top 1000 listed entities | BRSR Core assurance | FY 2026-27 | Weak ESG controls |
| Other listed entities | Voluntary BRSR | Recommended | ESG readiness gap |
| Suppliers to listed entities | Value chain ESG data | Increasingly requested | Vendor evaluation risk |
BRSR is governed by SEBI’s listed entity disclosure framework, but many of its data points depend on environmental compliance records. A company may file BRSR with stock exchanges, but the evidence often comes from CPCB, SPCB, factory records, HR systems, energy bills, waste processors and EPR portals.
This is why BRSR should be treated as a compliance-linked ESG report. For example, a company cannot report “environmental compliance – yes” if one of its plants has an expired Consent to Operate, pending hazardous waste authorization or unresolved SPCB direction. Similarly, a producer under e-waste, plastic waste, battery waste or ELV EPR cannot report circular economy commitments without matching EPR registration, return filing and certificate records.
| Regulation / Framework | Requirement | Important Number / Date | Applicable To | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEBI BRSR Circular | BRSR format introduced | 10 May 2021 | Listed entities | Wrong annual report disclosure |
| SEBI BRSR Core Circular | BRSR Core and value chain framework | 12 July 2023 | Top listed entities | Assurance gap |
| SEBI BRSR Core Industry Standards | Industry standard reporting | 20 December 2024 | BRSR Core covered entities | Inconsistent KPI reporting |
| SEBI 2025 Circular | Assurance or assessment, value chain and green credits | 28 March 2025 | Listed entities | Disclosure mismatch |
| SEBI LODR Regulation 34 | Annual report disclosure | Annual filing | Listed entities | Exchange query |
| Water Act, 1974 | Water consent and discharge compliance | CTE / CTO lifecycle | Industrial units | SPCB refusal |
| Air Act, 1981 | Air emissions and consent compliance | CTE / CTO lifecycle | Industrial units | Production restriction |
| Environment Protection Act, 1986 | Environmental law compliance | Continuous | Plants and facilities | Penalty and prosecution risk |
| EPR Rules | EPR registration, targets and returns | Quarterly / annual | Producers, importers, brand owners | CPCB action |
The strongest BRSR reports are not created by writing better paragraphs. They are created by maintaining better records. The company should keep plant-wise evidence for water, waste, energy, emissions, incidents, training, complaints, statutory approvals and EPR records.
The BRSR format has 3 sections and 9 principles. Section A provides the company profile. Section B explains policy and governance maturity. Section C provides actual performance data.
Section A is important because it sets the reporting boundary. It captures details such as locations, products, employees, workers, holding companies, subsidiaries, CSR applicability, complaints and material responsible business conduct issues. If the reporting boundary is wrong at this stage, all later environmental and social data may become unreliable.
Section B checks management systems. It asks whether policies cover all 9 principles, whether the board approved them, whether procedures exist, whether policies extend to value chain partners and whether goals have defined timelines. This is where ESG becomes a governance issue.
Section C is the core performance section. It includes measurable indicators such as energy consumed, water withdrawal, air emissions, Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, waste generation, waste recycled, employee safety, wages, human rights, complaints and customer responsibility.
| Section | Coverage | Typical Data Owner | Evidence Needed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Section A | General disclosures | Company Secretary, Finance, HR | Annual report, employee data, turnover, CSR details |
| Section B | Policies and governance | Board, Legal, ESG Head | Policies, board minutes, review records |
| Section C | ESG performance | EHS, HR, Procurement, Finance | Bills, logs, returns, registers, certificates |
| BRSR Core | Key ESG indicators | ESG Head, Assurance Team | Calculation sheets and source documents |
| Value Chain | Supplier and customer ESG data | Procurement and Sales | Supplier declarations and sales mapping |
A practical BRSR file should have at least 12 evidence folders. These should cover entity details, governance policies, employee data, worker data, wages, training, complaints, energy, water, GHG, waste, EPR records, environmental permissions and value chain partner data.
The environmental section is one of the most sensitive parts of BRSR Reporting in India. It requires numerical information that must match statutory records. If the company has 5 factories, data should normally be collected plant-wise and then consolidated at entity level.
SEBI’s BRSR format asks for water withdrawal by source in kilolitres, including surface water, groundwater, third party water, seawater or desalinated water and other sources. It also asks whether the entity has implemented Zero Liquid Discharge and requires details of coverage and implementation.
The format also requires disclosure of Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions and emissions intensity. It further asks whether any independent assessment, evaluation or assurance has been carried out by an external agency.
Waste management disclosure is also detailed. The BRSR format requires total waste generated in metric tonnes and category-wise waste such as plastic waste, e-waste, bio-medical waste, construction and demolition waste and battery waste.
Most importantly, the format asks whether the entity is compliant with applicable environmental laws, including the Water Act, Air Act, Environment Protection Act and rules thereunder. If not, details of non-compliance, penalties, regulatory action and corrective action must be provided.
| Disclosure Area | Unit / Number | Evidence Source | Common Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity consumption | kWh / GJ | Bills, meters, invoices | Wrong conversion factor |
| Fuel consumption | KL, MT, SCM, GJ | Purchase invoices, stock register | Missing plant-wise breakup |
| Scope 1 emissions | tCO2e | Fuel and process data | Incorrect emission factor |
| Scope 2 emissions | tCO2e | Electricity bills | Grid factor mismatch |
| Water withdrawal | KL | Meter readings, bills | Groundwater data missing |
| Waste generated | MT | Waste register, manifests | Vendor mismatch |
| Waste recycled | MT and percent | Recycler certificate | Unregistered vendor |
| EPR compliance | MT and certificate count | CPCB portal | Return mismatch |
| Environmental compliance | Yes / No | CTE, CTO, authorization | Expired consent |
BRSR does not directly replace EPR compliance, but it makes EPR data visible in ESG reporting. This is especially relevant for electronics, batteries, plastic packaging, automotive, solar, chemicals, consumer goods and import-heavy businesses.
Under e-waste rules, producers of notified electrical and electronic equipment are required to register on the portal and obtain EPR targets through the portal. The E-Waste SOP also states that producer registration is valid for 5 years and renewal should be applied for 120 days before expiry. It further requires financial year-wise sales data in weight based on average end-of-life.
For plastic packaging, PIBOs are required to comply with EPR obligations, obtain certificates from Plastic Waste Processors and use those certificates to meet EPR targets. The plastic EPR SOP states that the application process starts with self-registration on the web portal and includes general information, effluent / emission details, waste generation details and action plan for EPR implementation.
For ELV EPR, the targets are highly numerical. The ELV FAQ states that transport vehicles have minimum EPR targets of 8 percent of steel used for FY 2025-26 to FY 2029-30, 13 percent for FY 2030-31 to FY 2034-35 and 18 percent from FY 2035-36 onward. Non-transport vehicles follow the same 8 percent, 13 percent and 18 percent target bands but with different base vehicle introduction years.
These numbers matter for BRSR because Principle 2 and Principle 6 disclosures may cover product responsibility, circular economy, waste recovery, recycling, EPR applicability and environmental compliance. If a company claims strong circular economy performance but cannot show EPR certificates, returns and portal data, the BRSR disclosure becomes weak.
A listed company should therefore maintain an EPR evidence file containing registration number, product category, annual target, quarterly returns, annual returns, EPR certificates, recycler details, CPCB communications and management sign-off.
BRSR Core is not only a smaller version of BRSR. It is the assurance-ready subset of ESG performance indicators. SEBI’s 2023 circular describes BRSR Core as a subset of BRSR consisting of KPIs and metrics under 9 ESG attributes. It also added India-specific KPIs such as job creation in small towns, openness of business and gross wages paid to women.
From FY 2025-26, the top 500 listed entities are covered under BRSR Core assurance. From FY 2026-27, the top 1000 listed entities are covered. This means the number of companies needing stronger ESG data systems increases significantly.
A company preparing for BRSR Core should create evidence for every KPI. For energy, keep bills and meter records. For emissions, keep calculation sheets and emission factors. For water, keep meter readings and abstraction permissions. For waste, keep manifests, invoices and recycler certificates. For wages, keep payroll reports. For job creation, keep HR location-wise data.
| FY | BRSR Core Applicability | Practical Preparation Needed |
|---|---|---|
| FY 2023-24 | Top 150 listed entities | First assurance cycle |
| FY 2024-25 | Top 250 listed entities | Improved internal controls |
| FY 2025-26 | Top 500 listed entities | Plant-wise ESG data system |
| FY 2026-27 | Top 1000 listed entities | Full ESG assurance readiness |
The best time to prepare is the first quarter of the financial year. If the company waits until the annual report drafting stage, it may not be able to recreate monthly data, meter readings, vendor certificates or plant-level evidence.
Value chain ESG disclosure is becoming important because large listed companies depend on suppliers, dealers, recyclers, logistics partners, contract manufacturers and service providers. If value chain data is weak, the listed entity’s own ESG reporting becomes incomplete.
The 2023 BRSR Core framework originally considered value chain partners covering 75 percent of purchases and sales by value. Later, SEBI’s 2025 circular introduced ease-of-doing-business measures for assurance or assessment, ESG value chain disclosures and green credit disclosure.
In practical terms, listed companies should identify suppliers and customers contributing 2 percent or more to purchase or sales value, and then check whether the cumulative value chain coverage reaches 75 percent. This helps companies reduce unnecessary data collection from thousands of small vendors and focus on material partners.
A company with 1,200 vendors may find that only 40 vendors cover 75 percent of its purchase value. Those 40 vendors should be prioritized for ESG data collection. Similarly, a company with 500 customers may find that only 25 customers cover 75 percent of sales value.
Supplier ESG data may include energy consumption, GHG emissions, waste handling, labour practices, health and safety, human rights, EPR compliance, environmental approvals and grievance mechanisms.
| Value Chain Area | Data to Collect | Numerical Focus | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top suppliers | ESG declaration | 2 percent and 75 percent threshold | Missing supplier data |
| Contract manufacturers | Energy, water, waste | Plant-wise data | Hidden environmental exposure |
| Recyclers | Certificates and authorization | MT processed | Invalid claim |
| Logistics partners | Fuel and distance | Scope 3 estimate | Emission under-reporting |
| Packaging vendors | Material and recycled content | Percent recycled content | EPR mismatch |
BRSR is filed as part of the annual report by applicable listed entities. The filing should not begin at the end of the financial year. It should be managed as a 12-month ESG data cycle.
The first step is applicability confirmation. The company should check whether it falls within the top 1000 listed entities and whether BRSR Core applies for the relevant financial year. The second step is boundary setting. The company must decide which locations, plants, warehouses, offices, subsidiaries and joint ventures are included.
The third step is data owner mapping. Each disclosure should have a responsible department and a backup document. For example, energy belongs to EHS and finance, employee data belongs to HR, EPR belongs to compliance, policy data belongs to legal and governance belongs to the company secretary.
The fourth step is quarterly data collection. A quarterly approach reduces year-end pressure and improves accuracy. The fifth step is internal validation. Numbers should be checked against bills, registers, portal returns and statutory filings. The final step is management review, assurance or assessment where applicable, board approval and annual report filing.
| Step | Owner | Timeline | Key Documents | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Applicability check | Company Secretary | April | Market cap ranking | Wrong scope |
| 2. Reporting boundary | ESG Head | April | Entity and location list | Missing plant |
| 3. Data owner mapping | ESG Team | April to May | Responsibility matrix | Delayed data |
| 4. Monthly data capture | Plant and HR teams | Monthly | Logs, invoices, registers | Incomplete records |
| 5. Quarterly review | Compliance team | Quarterly | Evidence folder | Late correction |
| 6. EPR reconciliation | EPR team | Quarterly | CPCB portal records | Return mismatch |
| 7. BRSR drafting | ESG and CS team | Q4 | BRSR format | Formatting error |
| 8. Assessment or assurance | External agency | Before board approval | Calculation sheets | Qualification risk |
| 9. Board approval | Board / committee | Annual report cycle | Final BRSR | Governance risk |
| 10. Exchange filing | Listed entity | Annual report filing | Annual report | Filing observation |
BRSR risk is not limited to SEBI reporting. It can expose environmental, operational, financial and reputational issues. If the company discloses inaccurate environmental compliance, the issue may trigger questions from investors, stock exchanges, assurance providers, lenders and customers.
For manufacturers, the biggest risk is mismatch between BRSR and statutory records. If BRSR says all locations are compliant but an SPCB consent has expired, the disclosure is weak. If BRSR shows waste recycling but the vendor is not authorized, the disclosure may fail evidence review. If EPR is applicable but CPCB portal returns are missing, the company may face both ESG and regulatory risk.
For importers, incorrect EPR classification can affect customs clearance, product registration, CPCB approval and downstream customer confidence. For recyclers, inflated capacity or unsupported certificates can create CPCB portal risk and environmental compensation exposure.
Key business risks include CPCB rejection, CPCB portal suspension, SPCB refusal, environmental compensation, customs hold, production halt, stock exchange observation, investor red flag, assurance qualification and customer audit failure.
| Risk Area | Example | Business Impact |
|---|---|---|
| CPCB portal mismatch | EPR sales data not matching finance data | Target revision or rejection |
| SPCB consent issue | CTO expired at one plant | Production or renewal risk |
| Waste evidence gap | Waste sent to unregistered vendor | BRSR correction and legal risk |
| GHG calculation error | Wrong emission factor used | Assurance observation |
| Value chain gap | Supplier refuses ESG data | Incomplete disclosure |
| Policy gap | No board-approved ESG policy | Section B weakness |
| Complaint mismatch | HR and BRSR complaint numbers differ | Governance concern |
BRSR preparation should start with a document checklist. For a large listed company, 50 to 100 evidence files may be needed depending on business complexity, plant count and sector.
The company should create a digital ESG data room. This should include both raw evidence and final calculation sheets. Raw evidence includes invoices, registers, certificates, policies, approvals and returns. Calculation sheets should show how the final BRSR number was derived.
A strong document system reduces review time. It also helps during BRSR Core assessment, assurance, internal audit, board review, investor due diligence and customer ESG audit.
Essential document categories include annual report data, financial data, HR records, policy records, energy bills, fuel bills, water meter readings, waste manifests, EPR registration, CPCB returns, recycler certificates, CTE, CTO, hazardous waste authorization, environmental monitoring reports, safety records, complaint registers and supplier ESG declarations.
| Document Type | Minimum Records |
|---|---|
| Corporate data | CIN, registered office, paid-up capital, stock exchanges |
| Financial data | Turnover, net worth, CSR applicability |
| HR data | Permanent employees, workers, gender data, wages |
| Governance data | Policies, board approval, review minutes |
| Energy data | Electricity bills, fuel bills, renewable energy certificates |
| Water data | Meter readings, water bills, groundwater permission |
| Emission data | Scope 1 and Scope 2 calculation sheets |
| Waste data | Waste register, manifests, recycler certificates |
| EPR data | CPCB registration, returns, certificates, targets |
| Environmental approvals | CTE, CTO, authorization, EC conditions |
| Value chain data | Supplier declarations, procurement mapping |
| Assurance data | Evidence index, methodology, sign-off sheet |
BRSR Reporting in India has moved beyond basic ESG communication. It is now a structured compliance disclosure that connects SEBI reporting with environmental law compliance, CPCB portal records, SPCB permissions, EPR obligations, HR data, governance records and value chain information.
For listed entities, the biggest challenge is not filling the BRSR format. The real challenge is building reliable data systems across 12 months, multiple departments and several locations. A strong BRSR report should be supported by invoices, registers, permits, certificates, returns, calculations and board-reviewed policies.
The cost of early compliance preparation is much lower than the cost of delayed filing, incorrect disclosure, assurance qualification, CPCB rejection, SPCB action, investor concern or customer audit failure.
Companies that prepare early can use BRSR as more than a mandatory report. They can use it to improve internal ESG governance, reduce compliance risk, strengthen investor confidence and demonstrate responsible business performance with measurable data.
📞 +91 78350 06182
📧 wecare@greenpermits.in
👉 Book a Consultation with Green Permits
